![]() Wade,” Dannenfelser said in the interview. “I think that potential Republican voters are getting to know each of the candidates, and they deserve to know exactly where they stand on this issue, which is at its peak of importance given the overturning of Roe v. Later, a person familiar with the conversation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Haley privately told SBA officials “exactly what she said in her speech today,” and did not commit to a 15-week law, but rather only to “find a consensus to ban late-term abortion.” An SBA spokesperson told POLITICO that Haley “has assured us that she will commit to 15 weeks.” Haley instead noted policies that she believes most Americans can agree on, including opposing “abortion up to the point of birth” or jailing women who receive abortions.Īfterward, a spokesperson for Haley clarified that she has not called for a 15-week national restriction, even as SBA released a statement applauding Haley’s pledge to do so. In fact, Haley downplayed the likelihood of any highly restrictive national law being passed, noting that the Senate lacks the votes. But as Dannenfelser looked on during Haley’s speech Tuesday, the former governor and United Nations ambassador didn’t articulate the extent to which she believes the federal government should go in restricting abortion access. A week prior, the group had taken the extraordinary step of criticizing former president Donald Trump for saying that he believed abortion policy should be left to the states, essentially swearing off support for any federal legislation. Dannenfelser has maintained that her organization will oppose Republican presidential candidates who don’t embrace, at minimum, a national 15-week limit on abortions. Anthony Pro-Life America, stressed the need for candidates to show “boldness in communicating” their positions on abortion laws. In an interview Monday, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. for a “rally for reproductive freedom,” an event celebrating a Supreme Court decision to temporarily block a lower court’s restriction of access to abortion pill mifepristone. Haley’s address Tuesday came hours before Vice President Kamala Harris was scheduled to join abortion rights groups in D.C. After Haley finished, prominent anti-abortion activist Lila Rose called the speech “disappointing” and “not what pro-life voters are looking for.” While Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life, attended the address and called Haley “a remarkable leader,” others in the movement were left wanting. “I don’t judge someone who is pro-choice any more than I want them to judge me for being pro-life,” said Haley, who as governor of South Carolina, signed a law restricting abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Haley said her husband’s adoption out of foster care as a young child and her own struggle with infertility made her opposed to abortion - “not because the Republican Party told me to be.” She discussed her friend’s rape and subsequent fear of becoming pregnant. On Tuesday, she spoke from her own perspective as a woman and mother - identities unmatched among a slate of male Republican opponents. Haley is seeking to position herself as a candidate uniquely capable of tackling the debate. ![]() GOP candidates have lost a number of races to Democrats who championed abortion rights in the post- Dobbs era, and, over the past few weeks, presidential aspirants have walked on eggshells when discussing the topic. Haley’s struggle to articulate a clear position on abortion in an address that was billed as a chance to do just that highlights how fraught the issue is for Republicans on the national campaign trail. The pro-life laws that have passed in strongly Republican states will not be approved at the federal level,” Haley said. One area in which Haley was clear, however, was her expectation that nothing far-reaching would hit her desk, should she end up in the White House.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |